15 Jun 2025
Android

application de notre social comme dans l'épidode 1 saison 3 de ...

...blackmiror

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.


Your are here

Your idea of creating a social application similar to the one featured in the Black Mirror episode is entering a crowded space. The 'Swamp' category suggests that many similar solutions already exist, but none have truly captured the market's attention. With 10 similar products already identified, competition is high. Engagement in this category is generally low, indicated by the average number of comments being 0, which means people are not talking about or investing in these products. There's currently no discernible 'net use' or 'net buy' signal, suggesting people aren't actively expressing a desire to use or purchase such an application. Given these factors, successfully differentiating your application will be incredibly challenging. The advice for this category is Don't build it because the market is saturated with mediocre solutions.

Recommendations

  1. Before diving into development, deeply research why existing social applications haven't achieved widespread adoption. Identify their shortcomings and what unmet needs exist in the current social media landscape. You need to truly understand what's missing, instead of just iterating on existing features, as even though n_matches = 10, engagement is very low.
  2. If you decide to proceed, identify a very specific niche or group of users that are currently underserved by existing platforms. Instead of a broad 'social network,' perhaps focus on a community with unique needs and build features specifically for them. This will help you differentiate and foster a dedicated user base, and you can build features based on their feedback.
  3. Consider creating tools or integrations that enhance existing social media platforms rather than building a completely new one. Instead of trying to compete with giants, support them and carve out a niche by improving their user experience. For instance, building a tool for a very specific group as outlined above, and building it on top of existing APIs.
  4. Examine adjacent problems related to social interaction that might be more promising or less saturated. Instead of directly tackling social networking, think about communication, content creation, or community management tools. Think about the problems of social networking (anxiety, doomscrolling), and address these directly rather than another network.
  5. Given the 'Swamp' classification, it might be wise to conserve your resources and energy for a different, more promising venture. Not every idea is worth pursuing, and recognizing when to pivot or move on is a valuable skill for any founder. Do not fall in love with your idea.
  6. Based on the user discussions of similar products, focus on creating a unique UI and clearly define the purpose and value proposition of your application. Ensure all links, especially privacy policies, are correct and up-to-date to build trust with potential users. UI matters, and as an idea in the swamp you need to differentiate.

Questions

  1. What specific unmet need does your social application address that existing platforms fail to provide, and how will you validate this need before investing significant resources?
  2. Given the low engagement observed in similar products, what innovative strategies will you employ to foster a vibrant and active community within your application?
  3. How will you ensure that your application is not just another echo in the 'Swamp,' but a truly differentiated and valuable platform for its users, providing real value and addressing real problems?

Your are here

Your idea of creating a social application similar to the one featured in the Black Mirror episode is entering a crowded space. The 'Swamp' category suggests that many similar solutions already exist, but none have truly captured the market's attention. With 10 similar products already identified, competition is high. Engagement in this category is generally low, indicated by the average number of comments being 0, which means people are not talking about or investing in these products. There's currently no discernible 'net use' or 'net buy' signal, suggesting people aren't actively expressing a desire to use or purchase such an application. Given these factors, successfully differentiating your application will be incredibly challenging. The advice for this category is Don't build it because the market is saturated with mediocre solutions.

Recommendations

  1. Before diving into development, deeply research why existing social applications haven't achieved widespread adoption. Identify their shortcomings and what unmet needs exist in the current social media landscape. You need to truly understand what's missing, instead of just iterating on existing features, as even though n_matches = 10, engagement is very low.
  2. If you decide to proceed, identify a very specific niche or group of users that are currently underserved by existing platforms. Instead of a broad 'social network,' perhaps focus on a community with unique needs and build features specifically for them. This will help you differentiate and foster a dedicated user base, and you can build features based on their feedback.
  3. Consider creating tools or integrations that enhance existing social media platforms rather than building a completely new one. Instead of trying to compete with giants, support them and carve out a niche by improving their user experience. For instance, building a tool for a very specific group as outlined above, and building it on top of existing APIs.
  4. Examine adjacent problems related to social interaction that might be more promising or less saturated. Instead of directly tackling social networking, think about communication, content creation, or community management tools. Think about the problems of social networking (anxiety, doomscrolling), and address these directly rather than another network.
  5. Given the 'Swamp' classification, it might be wise to conserve your resources and energy for a different, more promising venture. Not every idea is worth pursuing, and recognizing when to pivot or move on is a valuable skill for any founder. Do not fall in love with your idea.
  6. Based on the user discussions of similar products, focus on creating a unique UI and clearly define the purpose and value proposition of your application. Ensure all links, especially privacy policies, are correct and up-to-date to build trust with potential users. UI matters, and as an idea in the swamp you need to differentiate.

Questions

  1. What specific unmet need does your social application address that existing platforms fail to provide, and how will you validate this need before investing significant resources?
  2. Given the low engagement observed in similar products, what innovative strategies will you employ to foster a vibrant and active community within your application?
  3. How will you ensure that your application is not just another echo in the 'Swamp,' but a truly differentiated and valuable platform for its users, providing real value and addressing real problems?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 10
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 0
  • Net use signal: 0.0%
    • Positive use signal: 0.0%
    • Negative use signal: 0.0%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 0.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Medla - Haz que tu día sea increíble

19 Feb 2024 Travel Tech

Una app donde podrás atrapar nuevos amigos. Pero necesitamos que más personas se sumen para que puedas encontrarlos y hacer nuevos amigos que estén cerca de tí, solo tienes que activar tu ubicación y viajar donde tú quieras.


Avatar
1
1
Relevance

Twist - Double Dating & Friends

01 Oct 2024 Dating Lifestyle

Twist est une application de rencontres qui réinvente le dating en le rendant plus social et sécurisé grâce au double dating. Plutôt que de se rencontrer seul à seul, les utilisateurs se mettent en duo avec un ami proche pour matcher avec d’autres paires.


Avatar
6
6
Top