Should I Build It Should I Build It
11 Jun 2025
Productivity

Organizing incoming messages and created automated replies when needed ...

...based on messages

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.

Your are here

You're entering a crowded space where many have tried to automate message responses, placing you squarely in the 'Swamp' category. With 21 similar products already out there, it's clear that this is a well-trodden path. The low average number of comments (2) across these products indicates low engagement. This could mean that existing solutions aren't fully meeting user needs, or that users aren't finding enough value to actively engage. Without any strong net use or buy signals, it's hard to determine if there's a real desire for these products. It would be best to proceed cautiously, as standing out will be tough, and making money even tougher.

Recommendations

  1. First, really dig into why existing solutions in this space haven’t become widely adopted or loved. Understanding their failures is crucial before investing your time and resources. The criticism summary of QuestionBase provides a good starting point: users want source verification for answers and customizable templates to reduce the burden on those answering repetitive questions.
  2. If you still believe in your idea, identify a very specific niche or group of users who are clearly underserved by current offerings. Instead of a general solution, focus on tailoring your product to their unique needs and workflows. For example, Respondy targets business needs and mentions using automation to get more leads.
  3. Consider building tools or integrations for the platforms or providers that already offer similar services. Instead of directly competing, you could enhance existing solutions and tap into their user base. The WingmanAi product faced criticism for using private messages without consent, so avoid similar privacy violations.
  4. Explore adjacent problems or unmet needs related to message organization and automation. There might be a more promising opportunity that avoids direct competition with the existing 'Swamp' of solutions. For example, instead of auto-replying, focus on sentiment analysis of incoming messages to prioritize urgent requests.
  5. Based on the 'Swamp' categorization and the number of similar products already available, it's crucial to carefully evaluate whether this is the best use of your time and energy. There might be other, more innovative ideas where you have a better chance of success. The negative feedback from users who dislike impersonal, robotic promotions should be a warning sign.
  6. Given the low engagement and lack of strong user signals, conduct thorough market research and user interviews before building anything. Validate your assumptions and ensure there's genuine demand for your specific approach to message automation. Look for critical signals that are positive.

Questions

  1. Given the existing solutions, what is one fundamentally different approach you can take to message organization and automated replies that would truly disrupt the market and avoid simply adding to the 'Swamp'?
  2. How can you leverage AI in a way that not only automates responses but also provides a personalized and human-like experience for users, addressing the concerns about impersonal, robotic promotions?
  3. Considering the privacy concerns raised by similar products, how will you ensure the ethical and responsible use of user data and messaging content, building trust and avoiding potential backlash?

Your are here

You're entering a crowded space where many have tried to automate message responses, placing you squarely in the 'Swamp' category. With 21 similar products already out there, it's clear that this is a well-trodden path. The low average number of comments (2) across these products indicates low engagement. This could mean that existing solutions aren't fully meeting user needs, or that users aren't finding enough value to actively engage. Without any strong net use or buy signals, it's hard to determine if there's a real desire for these products. It would be best to proceed cautiously, as standing out will be tough, and making money even tougher.

Recommendations

  1. First, really dig into why existing solutions in this space haven’t become widely adopted or loved. Understanding their failures is crucial before investing your time and resources. The criticism summary of QuestionBase provides a good starting point: users want source verification for answers and customizable templates to reduce the burden on those answering repetitive questions.
  2. If you still believe in your idea, identify a very specific niche or group of users who are clearly underserved by current offerings. Instead of a general solution, focus on tailoring your product to their unique needs and workflows. For example, Respondy targets business needs and mentions using automation to get more leads.
  3. Consider building tools or integrations for the platforms or providers that already offer similar services. Instead of directly competing, you could enhance existing solutions and tap into their user base. The WingmanAi product faced criticism for using private messages without consent, so avoid similar privacy violations.
  4. Explore adjacent problems or unmet needs related to message organization and automation. There might be a more promising opportunity that avoids direct competition with the existing 'Swamp' of solutions. For example, instead of auto-replying, focus on sentiment analysis of incoming messages to prioritize urgent requests.
  5. Based on the 'Swamp' categorization and the number of similar products already available, it's crucial to carefully evaluate whether this is the best use of your time and energy. There might be other, more innovative ideas where you have a better chance of success. The negative feedback from users who dislike impersonal, robotic promotions should be a warning sign.
  6. Given the low engagement and lack of strong user signals, conduct thorough market research and user interviews before building anything. Validate your assumptions and ensure there's genuine demand for your specific approach to message automation. Look for critical signals that are positive.

Questions

  1. Given the existing solutions, what is one fundamentally different approach you can take to message organization and automated replies that would truly disrupt the market and avoid simply adding to the 'Swamp'?
  2. How can you leverage AI in a way that not only automates responses but also provides a personalized and human-like experience for users, addressing the concerns about impersonal, robotic promotions?
  3. Considering the privacy concerns raised by similar products, how will you ensure the ethical and responsible use of user data and messaging content, building trust and avoiding potential backlash?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 21
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 2
  • Net use signal: 15.6%
    • Positive use signal: 19.6%
    • Negative use signal: 4.1%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 3.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 3.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

ReplyAuto.ai - Responds to emails based on previous conversation context

30 Mar 2024 Email Tech

ReplyAuto learns from past emails to craft tailored responses. It's compatible with Gmail, storing replies in drafts. Customize settings on the dashboard. Chat for feedback.

The product is well-received as a useful tool that saves time by intelligently designing email replies. Users appreciate its functionality and suggest improvements such as saving templates and implementing keyboard shortcuts for email responses to further enhance efficiency.

Avatar
9
3
33.3%
3
9
33.3%
Relevance

Replyze - Turn mentions into leads with auto-replies

27 Sep 2023 Marketing

An easy way to track mentions and respond to them on autopilot for Reddit and Twitter (X). You will save 30 - 60 hours monthly for each project!

Users are interested in the time-saving benefits of the product for social media management. There are questions about customization capabilities for messages and image/text in product responses. A user is also inquiring about the handling of critical pulses.

Avatar
78
3
33.3%
3
78
33.3%
Relevance

Question Base - Automate repetitive questions in Slack

27 Jun 2024 Artificial Intelligence Slack Productivity

Automate answers to operational and product questions, harness the know-how shared in chat, and manage repetitive queries. Save your team hours a week and focus on impactful work. 🔥🚀

QuestionBase's Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising its ability to automate Slack queries, save time, boost productivity, and streamline knowledge sharing. Many users highlighted its ease of use and effectiveness in solving the problem of repetitive questions and disruptive explanations. Several users congratulated the team and expressed excitement about trying the tool. Some asked about continuous improvement features, pricing details, answer verification, and handling multiple Slack channels. Users see QuestionBase as a game-changer for both enterprises and startups, a brilliant time-saver, and an impressive automated response system.

Users criticize the product for lacking source verification for answers and forcing users to repeatedly answer the same questions, creating inefficiency. A customizable template feature is desired to improve user experience and reduce the burden on key personnel who were previously occupied with recurring questions.

Avatar
343
35
28.6%
5.7%
35
343
28.6%
5.7%
Relevance

Turn mentions into leads with auto-replies

27 Sep 2023 Marketing

Users dislike impersonal, robotic product promotions, cold calls, and spam. They recommend mentionbot.io and seek unbiased views from personal networks rather than brand-specific opinions. Additionally, they are interested in learning how to turn mentions into leads.

Users criticized the product for impersonal and robotic promotions, which they believe disqualify companies. They also expressed strong dislike for cold calls and spam. Additionally, some users had an opposite take from the original poster.

Avatar
2
5
-40.0%
-40.0%
5
2
Relevance

Appdron Reply Robot - Reply to emails or Facebook comments etc using your voice.

25 May 2024 Artificial Intelligence Social Media Email

How much time do you spend daily replying to your emails? What if you could have an assistant that prepares your email based on your instructions? No only that what if you have an assistant that you can talk to for all your tasks on the web. That's this tool.

Congrats on launch; voice integration is clever; language/accent support?

Asks about language/accent support and other communication integrations.

Avatar
5
1
1
5
Relevance

I built a platform to your improve efficiency and response times

20 Jul 2024 Customer Communication

I am excited to finally be launching PromptlyReply!I built PromptlyReply due to a pain point that I personally experienced. As a former customer service agent, I constantly faced the challenge of managing repetitive responses. As my list of pre-set messages grew, my efficiency and response times began taking a hit. I realized there had to be a better way, and that's how PromptlyReply was born!Key features:Categorise your messagesSimply click the required message to copy the text to your clipboardSearch through categories and messages to quickly find the correct messageCopy history with filters to analyse trendsTeams with shared categories and messages to maintain consistency across all employeesChrome extension for more convenient accessShoutout to Shipfast - This allowed me to quickly began working on the most important aspects of PromptlyReply.I would love to hear any feedback you have!https://promptlyreply.com/

Avatar
2
2
Top