An API or SaaS that takes voice input and returns structured commands ...

...or API calls based on a user’s backend schema or command set. Ideal for devs building voice-based apps, home automations, or wearable devices.

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Freemium

People love using similar products but resist paying. You’ll need to either find who will pay or create additional value that’s worth paying for.

Should You Build It?

Build but think about differentiation and monetization.


Your are here

You're entering a market with a decent amount of existing solutions (n_matches = 15), so differentiation will be key. The general idea of turning voice into structured data or API calls resonates, especially for developers working on voice-based apps, home automation, or wearable devices. However, it seems like people want to use these types of products (medium engagement, avg n_comments = 10), but don't want to pay for them, putting you squarely in the 'Freemium' category. The challenge here is to figure out how to extract value, either through premium features or by targeting a different paying customer base. The criticism for similar products mainly revolves around pricing, latency, voice customization, privacy issues, and safety concerns. It seems like the key is going to be a great free tier, with compelling reasons to upgrade. Differentiating on features (e.g. better voice models, better language support) can help you stand out in an increasingly crowded market. Given the issues with competitors, safety, fraud and misuse are also potential concerns to be addressed early on.

Recommendations

  1. First, deeply understand who gets the most value from the free version of your API. Analyze usage patterns to identify power users or specific use cases that heavily rely on your service. Knowing this will help you craft your premium offering.
  2. Next, create premium features that significantly enhance the experience for those high-value users. Consider features like lower latency, higher rate limits, custom voice models, enhanced security, or detailed analytics. Frame these features as essential for serious developers or larger-scale applications.
  3. Explore the possibility of charging teams rather than individuals. Small teams building voice-enabled applications might be willing to pay for a collaborative platform with shared resources and centralized management. This can also simplify licensing and billing.
  4. Offer personalized help or consulting services to enterprise clients. Some businesses may need assistance with integrating your API into their existing infrastructure or customizing it for specific use cases. Providing hands-on support can be a valuable premium offering.
  5. Test different pricing approaches with small groups of users before a full launch. Experiment with tiered pricing, usage-based pricing, or feature-based pricing to find the optimal balance between revenue and user adoption. Collect feedback on perceived value and price sensitivity.
  6. Address latency concerns head-on. Many users of similar products complained about latency. Optimize your API for speed and provide clear latency benchmarks. Transparency here can build trust and attract developers who need real-time performance.
  7. Prioritize security and prevent misuse. Given the concerns about safety and potential misuse, implement robust security measures and content moderation policies. Clearly communicate these measures to users to build confidence in your platform. Include clear guidelines on not using the API for fraud.
  8. Actively solicit feedback on voice customization. While you may not be able to satisfy every request, demonstrating a willingness to improve voice models and language support can set you apart from competitors and show users you're listening.
  9. Consider an open-source strategy for parts of your stack, especially given the popularity of open source voice assistants. This can attract community contributions, build trust, and provide a competitive edge.

Questions

  1. Considering the 'Freemium' nature of this market, what are the non-obvious ways you can create value that compels users to upgrade beyond the free tier? Are there specific industries or applications where the paid features become indispensable?
  2. Given the reported issues with latency and voice customization in similar products, what specific technical choices will you make to ensure low latency and high-quality, customizable voice models from day one? How will you build this into your architecture?
  3. Considering the sensitivity around voice data and potential for misuse, what proactive steps will you take to ensure user privacy and prevent fraudulent activities using your API? How will you communicate these safeguards to your users to build trust?

Your are here

You're entering a market with a decent amount of existing solutions (n_matches = 15), so differentiation will be key. The general idea of turning voice into structured data or API calls resonates, especially for developers working on voice-based apps, home automation, or wearable devices. However, it seems like people want to use these types of products (medium engagement, avg n_comments = 10), but don't want to pay for them, putting you squarely in the 'Freemium' category. The challenge here is to figure out how to extract value, either through premium features or by targeting a different paying customer base. The criticism for similar products mainly revolves around pricing, latency, voice customization, privacy issues, and safety concerns. It seems like the key is going to be a great free tier, with compelling reasons to upgrade. Differentiating on features (e.g. better voice models, better language support) can help you stand out in an increasingly crowded market. Given the issues with competitors, safety, fraud and misuse are also potential concerns to be addressed early on.

Recommendations

  1. First, deeply understand who gets the most value from the free version of your API. Analyze usage patterns to identify power users or specific use cases that heavily rely on your service. Knowing this will help you craft your premium offering.
  2. Next, create premium features that significantly enhance the experience for those high-value users. Consider features like lower latency, higher rate limits, custom voice models, enhanced security, or detailed analytics. Frame these features as essential for serious developers or larger-scale applications.
  3. Explore the possibility of charging teams rather than individuals. Small teams building voice-enabled applications might be willing to pay for a collaborative platform with shared resources and centralized management. This can also simplify licensing and billing.
  4. Offer personalized help or consulting services to enterprise clients. Some businesses may need assistance with integrating your API into their existing infrastructure or customizing it for specific use cases. Providing hands-on support can be a valuable premium offering.
  5. Test different pricing approaches with small groups of users before a full launch. Experiment with tiered pricing, usage-based pricing, or feature-based pricing to find the optimal balance between revenue and user adoption. Collect feedback on perceived value and price sensitivity.
  6. Address latency concerns head-on. Many users of similar products complained about latency. Optimize your API for speed and provide clear latency benchmarks. Transparency here can build trust and attract developers who need real-time performance.
  7. Prioritize security and prevent misuse. Given the concerns about safety and potential misuse, implement robust security measures and content moderation policies. Clearly communicate these measures to users to build confidence in your platform. Include clear guidelines on not using the API for fraud.
  8. Actively solicit feedback on voice customization. While you may not be able to satisfy every request, demonstrating a willingness to improve voice models and language support can set you apart from competitors and show users you're listening.
  9. Consider an open-source strategy for parts of your stack, especially given the popularity of open source voice assistants. This can attract community contributions, build trust, and provide a competitive edge.

Questions

  1. Considering the 'Freemium' nature of this market, what are the non-obvious ways you can create value that compels users to upgrade beyond the free tier? Are there specific industries or applications where the paid features become indispensable?
  2. Given the reported issues with latency and voice customization in similar products, what specific technical choices will you make to ensure low latency and high-quality, customizable voice models from day one? How will you build this into your architecture?
  3. Considering the sensitivity around voice data and potential for misuse, what proactive steps will you take to ensure user privacy and prevent fraudulent activities using your API? How will you communicate these safeguards to your users to build trust?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 15
  • Engagement: Medium
    • Average number of comments: 10
  • Net use signal: 8.6%
    • Positive use signal: 12.4%
    • Negative use signal: 3.8%
  • Net buy signal: -0.6%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.8%
    • Negative buy signal: 1.4%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

OSS voice based conversational API with <1sec latency and other nuances

Hi Hackernews, we're Maitreya, Prateek and Marmik. Over the past few months we've been working on building a platform to build, scale and monitor voice based LLM applications.Demo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSrOmyR7oQs)1⃣ Open Source orchestration: We're open-sourcing our orchestration to quickly setup and create LLM based voice driven conversational applications https://github.com/bolna-ai/bolna/2⃣ Hosted API Platform: Exposing our managed solution via APIs to build voice driven applications https://docs.bolna.dev/api-reference/introduction3⃣ Normal LLM telemetry tools won't work in giving visibility for audio bytes in and out of the system across multiple models. So, we've build our own observability layer fully integrated with the dashboard as well.4⃣ 3 different modes for creating agents - Lite (Intent classification based) (useful for basic calls and really pocket friendly). Normal (<2sec latency but only one llm call means it's cheaper than nitro), Nitro (<1sec latency and but multiple llm calls means really expensive)5⃣ Follow up tasks like webhook integration, summarisation, and extraction.6⃣ Modular and extensible architecture, which means connecting two different llms yet parallel paths(for example code and english to automate leetcode screening interviews) is really easy, albeit you'll initially need some hacking until we're able to release that to both hosted and open source versions)Over the next weeks we'd be doing a lot of small releases here starting with a hindi SLM for lead qualification and sales within next 10 days.We'd love to welcome you guys to our community, give us feedback and together build "langchain for voice first AI applications".


Avatar
8
8
Relevance

SpeakStruct – Turn voice into consistent structured data

Hey folks,Built SpeakStruct to allow users to setup templates to turn voice input into consistent, structured output. Use cases from feedback I've had are customer support, coaching/check-ins, note taking, etc.Although there is a pricing section, signing up is free (no CC required). If you don't want to sign up, a demo is available here (sale-sy demo, but shows the product). https://app.arcade.software/share/nWm35szNPwD3PpH4eUSpOpen to all feedback.

Users questioned the target audience for loud music over voiceover, noted that the product aligns with future needs, and inquired if Whisper is used at the backend.

The loud music over the voiceover makes the product resemble a scam.


Avatar
11
3
-33.3%
3
11
Relevance

Speech-to-speech playground for OpenAI's new Realtime API

Hi there - Ben from LiveKit here!If you’re curious about OpenAI’s brand-new Realtime API and speech-to-speech model, check out this hosted playground and play with the model yourself. If you’d like to learn more about how this came together, read on.If you’re like me, you’ve probably been wondering what novel things a model like this can do in an API setting with unfettered access to the system prompt and other parameters. I’ve been fortunate to have had early access through my work at LiveKit, where we’ve built open-source developer tooling that makes deploying this model in a production app as simple as possible.I thought it would also be fun to build a “playground” environment, partially to dogfood our own tooling but largely because I just wanted to play with the model. This playground is freely available to anyone to try, and comes loaded up with a bunch of fun demos of the model’s unique capabilities that I’ve put together.What blew my mind is how much mileage you can get out of the system prompt alone in this API. Here are some use-cases that are at least halfway to a complete MVP:- "Customer Support": An complete phone support agent for the playground- "Spanish Tutor": A bilingual language-learning demo- "Meditation Coach": It can actually pause and resume speech all on its own as it guides you through a meditation routineAlso some fun (and a bit irreverent…) demos of its style and non-verbal capabilities:- "Smoker’s Rasp": It can cough and speak like it’s been smoking three packs a day for 30 years (my favorite, lol)- "Unconfident Assistant": Umms, buts, and more - surprisingly lifelike- "Opera Singer": The best singing demo I’ve been able to compose (but still not quite what they showed off back in May…)The playground doesn’t store anything anywhere besides your browser but you can share anything fun you put together with a link that encodes your config into URL params.For now - anyone can use this playground to access the model and give it a spin (session limit 5min). In the coming days when more people have access to the underlying API, I’ll update it to require you bring your own OpenAI API Key.Lastly - if you’re even more curious how this was built or want to tweak or adapt it for yourself, the whole project and every dependency is open-source (link in footer!).

Users are inquiring about the product's capabilities, such as playing Doom and non-verbal functions. Some users face access issues due to 'Rate Limit Exceeded' errors, while others mention the need to purchase tokens. Positive feedback includes praise for the product when it works. Questions about legacy voice mode suggest interest in text-to-speech features.

Users have criticized the product for requiring the purchase of tokens, experiencing rate limit issues, and encountering errors when the rate limit is exceeded. Additionally, there are complaints about non-verbal capabilities not functioning and the product only offering a legacy voice mode.


Avatar
10
7
7
10
Top